Scarne posted:
http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2009/09/update-on-geo-600-mystery-noise.html
Note that even though this article is dated before the Huffington Post article, it is simply because the Huffington Post article was written several months after the first noise reports and apparently didn't bother to go look to see if there were any updates about the noise.
Coriolus posted:
Where does it say that?
Scarne posted:
The noise that GEO600 was detecting at that time turned out to just be a tuning problem with the detector, and the frequencies the noise was observed at wasn't correct for it to be holographic noise anyways.
The noise that GEO600 was detecting at that time turned out to just be a tuning problem with the detector, and the frequencies the noise was observed at wasn't correct for it to be holographic noise anyways.
Where does it say that?
http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2009/09/update-on-geo-600-mystery-noise.html
Note that even though this article is dated before the Huffington Post article, it is simply because the Huffington Post article was written several months after the first noise reports and apparently didn't bother to go look to see if there were any updates about the noise.
Cool thx for the reference..
-----signature-----
A thousand sheep are louder than one man. As long as the Survivor-watching sheep outnumber the thinkers, nothing will change. - BD
