VaultNetwork.net Vault Network Boards
Author Topic: Oxford comma [Locked]
Ungabhunga  2 stars
Posts: 319
Registered: 2008-8-7 11:25:39
Oxford coma is closer to the mark.

 

-----signature-----
Grimdiegn_the_Gimp RIP
Grim451 RIP
DDO Knights of Siberys Cannith
AkagiyamaMissile  4 stars
Title: Lord of the Lactose Intolerant
Posts: 3,975
Registered: 2003-4-22 07:39:44
Stalin looks hot in tassle pasties.

 

-----signature-----
Stupidity is hard to get rid of, but at least I can admit I have a problem -Mithan-
Gobble Gobble Mother******! -Thankskilling
and off course divers license don't count either this sucks balls.-FD
Bring it on like Donkey Kong
Arc_DT  2 stars
Title: Mithan said I am smart
Posts: 363
Registered: 2002-5-28 08:25:51
Eradiani posted:

To be proper grammar the way that these Oxford people are reading the sentence it should be "We invited the strippers: JFK and Stalin."

So technically they are being snooty about grammar and not following proper grammar to make the non-oxford comma users look bad /shrug


No. It's rarely followed, but if you're going to be persnickety, I'm afraid that what precedes and what follows a colon must both be complete sentences. "JFK and Stalin" is merely a noun phrase. Noun complements *may* be offset by dashes instead of commas, but the comma is the standard method of doing so. It is therefore entirely proper to read this sentence without the Oxford comma as a direct object with a noun complement instead of a list.

 

-----signature-----
"... We just need a president to sign this stuff... Pick a Republican with enough working digits to handle a pen to become president."
-Grover Norquist
.
MICHIGAN - Where the trees are the right height!