| Author |
Topic:
Warrants Needed for GPS Monitoring, Supreme Court Rules
[Locked] |
Scarne
Title: Capo di Scientifico
Posts: 1,087
Registered: 2001-7-23 15:24:34
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Warrants Needed for GPS Monitoring, Supreme Court Rules
|
|
|
imaloon1
Posts: 674
Registered: 2003-9-15 07:19:53
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Warrants Needed for GPS Monitoring, Supreme Court Rules
|
YAY!
Oh wait the Federal judges are already in the bag....
-----signature-----
The time draws nearer to your fate
|
Walker_ID
Posts: 673
Registered: 2002-5-29 10:20:09
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Warrants Needed for GPS Monitoring, Supreme Court Rules
|
effin eh!
one of the best scotus decisions in some time...and it was unanimous!
they had no obligation to vote the way they did and i fully expected them to side with authorities...
awesome decision
-----signature-----
You can't outrun Darwin
|
|
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Warrants Needed for GPS Monitoring, Supreme Court Rules
|
This is good news, but does not go far enough yet.
-----signature-----
"Goddammit, Swearengen, I don't trust you as far as I could th'ow you, but I enjoy the way you lie."
I don't typo often, but when I do, I blame Swype.
|
Abaddon_Ambrosius
Title: Retired Theurgist TL
Posts: 1,674
Registered: 2001-12-21 09:51:39
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Warrants Needed for GPS Monitoring, Supreme Court Rules
|
A mistake was obviously made here. Next year some other case will get forced up to them so they can reverse unanimously.
-----signature-----
In the immortal words of Socrates - "I drank what?"
"God you guys suck at the internet - how can you fail to locate porn?!" - Eternal_Midnight
"Knowing means nothing." - Fat-badger
|
Sea_of_inK
Posts: 488
Registered: 2004-10-18 12:57:37
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Warrants Needed for GPS Monitoring, Supreme Court Rules
|
As it was, there were only a couple states that had laws against the practice.
I'd read of police using some type of projectile they could shoot at vehicles to adhere a tracking device. All done without warrants!
-----signature-----
|
|
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Warrants Needed for GPS Monitoring, Supreme Court Rules
|
|
Man, this sucks. I've been doing tons of illegal shit to get a free GPS.
|
|
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Warrants Needed for GPS Monitoring, Supreme Court Rules
|
Altra_Shadowstalker posted:
This is good news, but does not go far enough yet.
I agree, as the unanimous decision bares out, it doesn't go far enough. I'm really happy it was unanimous though. Maybe that this was a unanimous decision will send a signal to the rest of government that it has gone off the rails. (Too much to hope for probably)
The awful Citizen's United outcome still needs to be dealt with.
|
Groucho48
Posts: 821
Registered: 2003-10-22 03:00:14
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Warrants Needed for GPS Monitoring, Supreme Court Rules
|
Great decision!
-----signature-----
“Science is like sex: sometimes something useful comes out, but that is not the reason we are doing it.†– Richard Feynman
|
|
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Warrants Needed for GPS Monitoring, Supreme Court Rules
|
I read somewhere that the argument by the folks defending warrant-less GPS monitoring included mentioning that they could do it to the Supreme Court Justices. I thought that was hilarious.
Either way good decision.
-----signature-----
The People's Intern
"If I had a plan to kill liberals the liberals would not know about it. Until it is too late of course. I have no such plan, sleep well, sleep deeply." -Fisted
LOTRO: Windfola - Telpehta
|
