Sansfear posted:
Modeeb posted:
Sarah! Sarah!
I so want to see the Republican delegates free to choose whoever they want. And, then they choose Sarah!
If you stoonads can elect w and dan Quayle, then Sarah as your nominee doesnt require an imagination. Do it!
This from the party that gave us John Kerry?
I have to admit, after watching the current train wreck, I'm beginning to understand how the Dems felt back in 2004.
Kerry is a pretty decent Senator. He was a lousy candidate. I suspect he wouldn't have been a very good President. In any event, I didn't vote for him.
But, he is light years ahead of Palin and Romney and Santorum and Gingrich.
Try to wiggle out of it how you will. You have a collection of candidates that is so pathetic that a President with 9% unemployment and who doesn't really have a base that is fanatical for him, will win so many votes that Republicans are likely to lose the House. Democrats might even hold the Senate.
I predict Obama will win with the largest margin in modern times. This whole fuss about contraception bumped the single female vote up like 18%. The only demographic that Republicans are winning is old white guys. And, Mormons, if you are Romney.
-----signature-----
“Science is like sex: sometimes something useful comes out, but that is not the reason we are doing it.†– Richard Feynman
