crazy liberals

There must need be proof of a crime, "fishing" for a conviction isn't allowed, I do not think. And the authorities did not have a crime, even though there was a fatality.

 

-----signature-----

Not Guilty!


and like the DA still waiting for proof of guilt.

 

-----signature-----

Proof of guilt before a trial?

 

-----signature-----

Too much garbage out there...we should postpone judgment until more facts are known. Way too many seem to view Zimmerman criminally guilty.


The media is not helping though:

"That apology addresses the “Today” show’s failure to abridge accurately the conversation between Zimmerman and the dispatcher in this high-profile case. This is how the program portrayed a segment of that conversation:

Zimmerman: This guy looks like he’s up to no good. He looks black.

And here is how it actually went down:

Zimmerman: This guy looks like he’s up to no good. Or he’s on drugs or something. It’s raining and he’s just walking around, looking about.

Dispatcher: OK, and this guy — is he black, white or Hispanic?

Zimmerman: He looks black."

**

"ABC News aired a surveillance video from the police station that made it appear as if they had proof that Martin couldn’t have attacked Zimmerman that evening. But the Daily Caller showed that when the picture is magnified one can see what clearly looks like a cut several inches long on the back of Zimmerman’s head."

 

-----signature-----

btw, the mistaken editing from NBC (see below) - absolutely disturbing. How much fuel did they falsely throw on this fire...?


Zimmerman: This guy looks like he’s up to no good. He looks black.

And here is how it actually went down:

Zimmerman: This guy looks like he’s up to no good. Or he’s on drugs or something. It’s raining and he’s just walking around, looking about.

Dispatcher: OK, and this guy — is he black, white or Hispanic?

Zimmerman: He looks black.

 

-----signature-----

and more distortions:


ABC News reported last week that Sanford police detective Chris Serino, unconvinced by Zimmerman’s story of self-defense, wanted to charge him with manslaughter, but was overruled by Wolfinger’s office.

A separate report by news website TheGrio.com, unconfirmed by Reuters, said Wolfinger left his home the Sunday night of the shooting to meet with Sanford police in person.

Benjamin Crump, a lawyer for the Martin family, asked the Justice Department in a letter on Monday to investigate those reports. Though the letter reported the events without attribution, Crump told Reuters his information came from the media reports and he did not have independent verification.

Wolfinger had declined all comment since removing himself from the case on March 22, but fired back in a statement on Monday.

“I am outraged by the outright lies contained in the letter by Benjamin Crump,” Wolfinger said. “I encourage the Justice Department to investigate and document that no such meeting or communication occurred.”

Wolfinger said last month he removed himself from the case in the hope of “toning down the rhetoric.”

 

-----signature-----

lol Norm Wolfinger calling Crump a liar without actually saying Crump is a liar

 

-----signature-----

Wrong. It's got nothing to do with color. Other than the first post I ever made, a jab at Obama rather than the actual incident, I haven't brought color up other than to wonder why you feel so invested in the issue. You sure want it to be about color for other people Cabby. Why is that?

Eyewitnesses have also stated plainly that Zimmerman was not fighting for his life, that he was not where he claimed to be or hurt as bad as he claims to be. Audio tapes have pretty much eliminated the idea that Zimmerman was calling for help, but somebody was. If Zimmerman wasn't whining and asking for help who was?

Tell me Cabby, why do you choose to ignore the evidence that doesn't support how YOU want this to be? I at least acknowledge the evidence you rely on yet you pretend that there is nothing else. That's kind of retarded.

Having your head allegedly banged is not necessarily life threatening, particularly if it was on the grass or you did it yourself after shooting some unarmed kid. Where is the broken nose? Why are there more witnesses that call Barney Fife into question than the one that you claim is relevant? You aren't just not answering these questions you are pretending that they don't exist.

The irony and hypocrisy of you saying that I want it to be other than it is and that it's about color cracks me up.

I'll say it again for clarity. My position is based on facts. Yours isn't. I'll be happy to be proved wrong.

You won't.

 

-----signature-----

Please point me to an eyewitness that says Zimmerman wasn't fighting for his life.

 

-----signature-----