according to a surprisingly eye-opening piece in the normally pro-OWS New York Times
The paper studied those with incomes in the top 1 percent of selected regions around the country.
Folks falling into that category are less likely to be “fat cats†than they are to be doctors (one in five) — or people who’ve built thriving family businesses from the bottom up.
Indeed, some 60 percent have succeeded on their own, without inherited wealth.
They’ve done so through a combination of education and intense hard work — three times more likely than the “99 percent†to work 50 hours a week or more.
They account for nearly one in three dollars of all philanthropic giving.
And while they earn less than 20 percent of all pre-tax income nationally, they pay more than 25 percent of all federal taxes.
They’re also spread out across the heartland — not just in New York and Los Angeles.
And their income varies regionally, too — it takes $790,000 a year to make the cut in Manhattan and $900,000 in Stamford. But in Macon, Ga., it takes just $270,000 — a figure that would be just upper-middle-class in Manhattan.
And while they have more children than middle- and upper-middle-class families, they don’t have more cars.
In other words, they’re hardly the idle rich.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/15/business/the-1-percent-paint-a-more-nuanced-portrait-of-the-rich.html?pagewanted=all
How many 1% people here inherited their money vs who earned it?
-----signature-----
A Nation of Sheep Breeds a Government of Wolves!


