| Author |
Topic:
Defense of Marriage Act ruled unconstitutional by judge
[Locked] |
Scarne
Title: Capo di Scientifico
Posts: 1,087
Registered: 2001-7-23 15:24:34
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Defense of Marriage Act ruled unconstitutional by judge
|
|
|
|
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Defense of Marriage Act ruled unconstitutional by judge
|
Shouldn't they defend this up to the Supreme Court and then throw the lawsuit? That way it'll be struck down for reals instead of being appealed a few years later when some religious nutjobs gets it in their head that their idea of marriage trumps the rights of a minority of American Citizens.
-----signature-----
"Goddammit, Swearengen, I don't trust you as far as I could th'ow you, but I enjoy the way you lie."
I don't typo often, but when I do, I blame Swype.
|
gatzby
Title: Insanity Personified
Posts: 86
Registered: 2001-7-26 17:49:19
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Defense of Marriage Act ruled unconstitutional by judge
|
I'm torn on this issue.
On the first, DOMA is a horrible piece of legislation, and I am glad it is going away.
On the second, the President is bound by oath to execute the laws of this nation, his job isn't to determine constitutionality of said laws. His justice department should have been defending DOMA until it was ruled unconstitutional.
-----signature-----
Radio Shack TRS 80 | 640k | 5.25 Drive INTEGRATED!
A stretched thread = A useless thread
|
Yukishiro1
Posts: 3,243
Registered: 2002-9-20 23:52:57
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Defense of Marriage Act ruled unconstitutional by judge
|
|
Um it is totally the president's job to decide not to defend laws he thinks are unconstitutional. I would agree if it were just personal preference but if something is unconstitutional the president shouldn't be defending it in court. Whether he should continue to enforce the law in the meantime is a more difficult question that depends more on the specifics of the situation.
|
Scarne
Title: Capo di Scientifico
Posts: 1,087
Registered: 2001-7-23 15:24:34
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Defense of Marriage Act ruled unconstitutional by judge
|
gatzby posted:
On the second, the President is bound by oath to execute the laws of this nation, his job isn't to determine constitutionality of said laws. His justice department should have been defending DOMA until it was ruled unconstitutional.
The DOJ still follows and enforces DOMA. They just don't bother arguing for it in court any more because all the arguments they have have already been struck down by judges. 
-----signature-----
E Pluribus Unum
|
Sea_of_inK
Posts: 488
Registered: 2004-10-18 12:57:37
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Defense of Marriage Act ruled unconstitutional by judge
|
It will be nice to be equal in the eyes of the state.. some day.
-----signature-----
|
theredkay1
Posts: 611
Registered: 2008-5-16 10:37:09
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Defense of Marriage Act ruled unconstitutional by judge
|
gatzby posted:
I'm torn on this issue.
On the first, DOMA is a horrible piece of legislation, and I am glad it is going away.
On the second, the President is bound by oath to execute the laws of this nation, his job isn't to determine constitutionality of said laws. His justice department should have been defending DOMA until it was ruled unconstitutional.
He is required to execute the laws. But that doesnt mean the justice department must defend all existing laws. Those two things arent the same.
|
