http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XuY5nc47cd4&feature=related

Every time Galloway speaks, right wing nuts have tiny little aneurysms in their tiny little brains.

The argument here being that what was 'home' 1700 years ago doesn't give people never born or raised there any 'right to return' and occupy (the expulsion of non-Jews is a different issue).

True. Otoh, they did, they are there, and have been since the '40's, so using the same logic, the displaced Palestinians not born or raised in Judea (Palestine) have no 'right to return' either.


Or am I off the mark?

 

-----signature-----

lol

 

-----signature-----

I'd say comparing an event that happened 2000 years ago to an event that happened less than 100 years ago and is still on going is pretty stupid.

So, the time frames cannot be used as arguments or comparitors.


Logical train wreck. Time has no relativity to this actually - the activities involving return to Israel have ALWAYS been ongoing as far as the Jews are concerned.


Nothing so far said changes the FACT that they ARE a nation and they ARE there to stay.

 

-----signature-----

I didn't say Israel should go anywhere.

I just think they should stay on their land, and should probably return some of what they've taken.

The 1967 borders renegotiated a bit should work.

Also, what do you mean by "have ALWAYS been ongoing as far as the Jews are concerned."

I'm a little confused by that statement.