Kinda had an idea for the rankings...What about ranking by winning percentage vs. just how many points you have. But to be ranked you would need to have at least 50-100 verified kills or something of that nature. I think this way of ranking someone would be better way to judge who is who. Its not perfect but I think it would be better then the current system.


Just an idea, not sure if this had been thrown around at all.

 

-----signature-----

nothing...

 

-----signature-----

People would just macro kills...


It doesn't work, the only good way to track PK kills is to track who killed who, so when someone claims they are better than another person, they simply need to look it up, and see who beat the other more.

Well if thats the case then, if you only get the Kill shot that that does not count towards your Kill/Death Ratio.

 

-----signature-----

any third party utility to rank anything is a bad idea, it will alway have a weakness

 

-----signature-----

Well nothing is perfect, I was trying to figure out a better ranking system. The current one just works by who plays more...so its more of a quantity of quality is ya get my drift. If ya go by a Kill/death ratio..it would be a better way of showing who is better. It would have to be tweaked a tad, as I said before.

 

-----signature-----